Four paths. Each built for a different situation. Here is who each one is for, what it costs, what it produces, and who should pick something else.
1. The $99 Course: Master Claude Code
Who it is for: individuals who want to learn Claude Code at their own pace. People who want a structured curriculum that builds from first principles to deployment. Learners who value a complete foundation over speed.
What you get: 9 modules, 36 lessons, quizzes with auto-grading, hands-on projects, and a certificate with public verification. Self-paced. Available immediately.
Who it is NOT for: someone who needs a specific tool built by next month. The course teaches you to build. It does not build for you. If you have a deadline, look at tutoring or a governance sprint.
2. Private Tutoring
Who it is for: founders building their first tool who are stuck on a specific problem. Executives who need to demo AI capability for their board in three weeks. Operators who have a workflow to automate and do not have time for a full course.
What you get: 1-on-1 sessions with a practitioner who has built production systems with Claude Code. You work on your actual project, not a sample exercise. Between sessions, you have async support for the questions that come up while building on your own.
What it costs: session packages vary by scope. Every engagement starts with a 30-minute diagnostic session to determine whether tutoring is the right fit.
Who it is NOT for: people who are early in their AI journey and need foundational concepts before they can direct sessions effectively. Do the course first. Then book tutoring when you have a specific project.
3. Corporate and Enterprise Training
Who it is for: teams of 5 to 100 people who need coordinated AI capability. Companies preparing for an AI implementation, a governance audit, or a competitive response. Organizations that need documented training, role-specific curricula, and measurable outcomes.
What you get: a custom training program scoped to your team. Role-specific tracks (operations, sales, finance, compliance, leadership). Governance documentation. Internal tools built during training that the team owns afterward.
What it costs: $500 to $1,500 per person depending on team size, duration, and scope. Detailed pricing is determined in the scoping call.
Who it is NOT for: a single employee whose company will not fund team-level training. The course is better for individual learners. Corporate training works when the organization commits to it as a team capability, not an individual skill.
Get a corporate training quote
4. Governance Sprint
Who it is for: organizations that need a specific tool built, need their team trained to own it, and need it done in a defined timeframe. Companies with a clear problem, accessible data, and an internal champion who will drive the engagement.
What you get: a 2-week sprint that produces working tools, a CLAUDE.md governance document, training for your team, and a complete handoff. You own the code, the documentation, and the capability to extend it.
What it costs: $3,000 to $15,000 depending on team size and complexity. Exact pricing after a 30-minute scoping call.
Who it is NOT for: organizations that are not sure what they need yet. If you do not have a clear problem to solve, start with a consulting call, not a sprint. The sprint is most effective when the problem is defined and the data is accessible.
Not sure which path fits?
Start with a 30-minute call. We will ask what you are trying to accomplish, what your timeline looks like, and what resources you have. We will recommend the right path, even if it is not one of ours.
Get posts like this in your inbox
No spam. New articles on AI strategy, governance, and building with AI for small business.
Keep Reading
The AI skills gap is a leadership gap, not a technology gap
Companies fail at AI because leadership does not understand the tools. The fix starts at the top.
What a governance sprint costs: and what it saves
Transparent sprint pricing, what drives the cost, and ROI calculations for three buyer types.
How to get your board to approve an AI training budget
The three arguments that actually move budget committees: risk mitigation, competitive defense, and specific ROI.